The highest court should be heavily biased in favor of letting the decisions of the lower courts stand.
By The Associated PressTuesday, March 21, 2006
(AP) - Highlights of actions taken Monday by the Supreme Court. The justices:
Declined to take up an appeal from a Pittsburgh Steelers fan who claimed taxpayers in National Football League cities have been coerced into helping build costly new stadiums.
Refused to consider tossing out a $50 million damage award against Philip Morris USA to the family of a two-pack-a-day California smoker who died of cancer.
Affirmed a lower court decision against a photographer who claimed a federal decency law violated her free-speech rights to post pictures of sadomasochistic sexual behavior on the Web.
Declined to give Jonathan Pollard, now serving a life sentence for spying for Israel, access to records that could bolster his case for presidential clemency.
Said they would not consider reinstating Robert O. Marshall's death sentence in New Jersey in a case that inspired a best-selling book, "Blind Faith."
Refused to consider an appeal from former Arkansas Gov. Jim Guy Tucker, who wants to withdraw his 1998 guilty plea to tax conspiracy.
Turned down a case that sought to open U.S. presidential elections to voters in Puerto Rico.
Refused to consider an appeal from Florida death row inmate William Van Poyck over DNA testing.
1 comment:
I think so too. The Supreme Court is better being the boss that let's the subordinates do their jobs stepping in only in egregious circumstances.
Post a Comment